The geographical political scene of South Asia is currently facing talks about the new warmth in Pakistan -Bangladesh relations. In India and as a result, most parts of the world – historical events about this relationship, especially by March 1971 1971 1971 1971 Incess, when the Pakistan Army attacks genocide on intellectuals at Dhaka University. And other people who guide Bangladeshi independence have taken a deep shape. . December 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 to 19771 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 19771 197771 197771 197771 1977 to 19777 to 197777777 to 197777777 to December 1977 December 1997 they said, “December 1997 December. Empowering.

Old assumptions die hard

Given these historical statements, a longtime assumption in Indian psychology has taken the root of the partition of two countries after the partition of Pakistan and its decisive military defeat-causing the weapons of 93,000 prisoners of the war. Have been put. . Another widespread belief is that Bangladesh, as a nation of intervention and sacrifices in the Indo-Pak war in 1971, will be permanently grateful and India’s birth. The strong relationship will remain. Although India’s Bangladesh relations have been widely positive for decades, some factors-such as the assassination of Sheikh Mujib in 1975, the shelter of separatist leaders from the northeast of India in Dhaka, and the permanent problem of illegal migration. Occasionally stressed. However, the idea of ​​recovering Bangladesh with Pakistan after 54 years is incomprehensible to many.

During these five decades, India has played an important role in the economic growth of Bangladesh through trade, investment, infrastructure projects, energy cooperation, technical training, financial support, and policy support. These partnerships have significantly increased Bangladesh’s economic capabilities and globally. However, has India now be declared an opponent in the eyes of Bangladesh’s leadership in a government in Dhaka? The cruel history of the Pakistan Army’s actions in 1971 – rap, persecution, and genocide – has shown elimination of collective memories. The recent high -profile visits between Pakistan and Bangladesh are challenging the partnership of India Bangladesh.

Travel in Chittagong

One of the most notable visits was that a six -member high -level delegation from Bangladesh Army to Rawalpindi was headed by Lieutenant General Kamul Zaman, Principal Staff Officer of the Bangladesh Armed Forces Division. Immediately after that, Pakistan’s ISI Director General Anlaisis, Major General Shahid Amir Ashar, along with other senior officials visited Dhaka. Unconfirmed reports show that the delegation traveled a camp near Silguri transit – an area that is often considered to be the heel of India’s Achilles, though perhaps not as weak as it is considered. The delegation also visited Chittagong and met with tribal leaders.

One of the basic truths in international relations is that change in government does not automatically enmity with the people of one nation. However, the new Bangladesh government, which is the reason is that it plans to change the balance of the subcontinent. The rapidly arranged exchanges between Bangladesh and Pakistan, especially Rangpur and beyond, indicate a potential rehabilitation that cannot afford to ignore India.

Chittagong offers a clear indication to any observer that the military establishment is trying to highlight the threats of India. However, no serious military strategy is a direct threat. Just a high level visit is not one. Instead, the Pakistan Bangladesh duo is trying to send a message-probably many.

Messages to India

First of all, their purpose is to identify that peace and stability along the Bangladesh border cannot be appreciated while India is focused on securing its western front. Secondly, they try to show that both countries and their militants are willing to separate their turbulent past and cooperate against the shared threats understood.

So far, a satisfactory factor in Bangladesh has been that the Bangladesh army was only partially affected by political turmoil and streets. It is now increasing due to anti -India sentiment in Bangladesh that it is not surprising. In particular, Sheikh Hasina’s withdrawal of safe withdrawal in India was in collaboration with the army. So far, there was little evidence of change in his approach, though there may be some signs.

Let the practitioners speak

Personally, I have always had a positive view of the Bangladesh Army. His senior leadership was intellectual bandout to engage me for an hour on the need for my point of view and a balanced perspective about political Islam. In professional dialogue – especially in the UN peace process, Bangladesh Army officials have shown a strong and practical approach to permanent faith. In fact, it has been the Bangladesh army that has worked as a buffer, which has prevented Bangladesh from being completely facing Islamist fundamentalism.

It would be better to learn from the experience of the Pakistan Army, which is now suffering from the consequences of promoting fundamentalism and terrorism. Fortunately, Dhaka is still quite practiced, both in and outside the uniform, which understand the dangers of close alignment with Pakistan.

Trump’s fears

Meanwhile, the Biden administration’s negligent policies are unlikely to please Trump 2.0, which facilitates Mohammed Younus to increase power – with a government that shows little respect for its minority communities. – Given that the economy is bad and the lowest manufacturing is the lowest in the years, Trump has the advantage of changing the situation with strategic relief manipulation.

Also, with Foreign Minister Jaishkar, the new US administration and Prime Minister Modi are expected to meet with President Trump in February 2025, a favorable result. Trump has very little tolerance for those who want to create instability where no one is present.
India, by itself, is exposed to recent developments, and keeping its strategy of silent diplomacy on rhetoric. This is a point of view that is the best prerequisite.

(Author is a member of the National Disaster Management Authority, Chancellor of Central University Kashmir, and former GOC of 15 Corps based on Srinagar.)

Disposal: These are the author’s personal opinion

(Tagstotranslate) Bangladesh



Source link