Last week, Germany presented a tough picture of its political scene. It seems that it is a nation that suffers from its past, its future and the disturbing present. Thousands of people have taken to the streets of German cities, raising the rise of the right right for Germany (AFD). Nevertheless, the same day, another incident was coming out that sent more waves than German borders. On a video link, Tech billionaire Elon Musk addressed the AFD election campaign gathering, commenting that Europe’s liberals think it is provocative and disturbing.

Musk stressed, “German culture is good to be proud of German values, and not to lose any kind of multi -cultural values ​​that reduce everything.” If his bold claim was not followed, the statement was immense: “Children should not be guilty of their parents’ sins, leave their great grandparents. Pay a lot of attention to past crime. It’s going, and we need to move forward.

Trump & Company

Ironically, many people did not lose. Musk, who had just contradicted a controversy over the inauguration of Donald Trump just days ago, some people had a Nazi salute, now a party to a “right -wing extremist” organization through German security services. The key virtual was standing as a guest. In addition to fueling the fire, Musk announced the AFD openly and announced: “I’m very excited for AFD. I think you are really the best hope for Germany. Fight for a great future.

This confirmation marked Musk’s second high -level engagement with the right -wing party in recent weeks. A few days ago, he interviewed party leader Alice Widel on X, expressing concern over electoral interference and the prejudice of the platform.

A global order of a teaser

In the minds of the European Establishment, a biggest, more ugly question arises from the German politics of Kasturi: Is this a preview of a new wave of translantic populism, in which the Tech ‘Olegrich’ happy the White House is happy Are doing? Digging the crime with parts of Germany and Europe can sit well, but it falls into the center of the European project. It is believed that the European Union, for all its shortcomings, is built on the basis of historical calculation. This is a conscious attempt to ensure that the horrors of the 20th century have neither forgotten nor repeated.

After President Trump’s return to power, Europe confronts itself with a passionate US, where translatable relations are less visible about contributions and shared values ​​and more about electricity dramas and transactions. Many people of the entire subcontinent feel like the agenda of the billionaires and the president’s proposal through the traditional Western playbox.

After the war, the order after the war, once the basis for global stability, is teasing on the bride. In the first week of Trump’s statements about NATO and Europe, and his new term, his major operations have sent shockwaves through European capitals. It is clear that Trump has returned with a strong commitment to emphasize the focus and American domination. An amazing example of this came out on Sunday when the news broke that Trump had imposed a 25 % tariff on Colombia, one of the closest allies in the United States and its largest trade in Latin America. Is a partner. The reason for this was that the country’s non -documentary was refused to allow military planes carrying immigrants from the country to land on its territory. The move, which has been seen in Europe with frustration, looked like a tough warning for both friends and enemies: co -operation or consequences.

Trump means business

For European leaders, the message is unacceptable. The second term of Trump is about force others to force the US line through economic and political advantage. These bold bolds and many people say that carelessness-rich Europe suffers from the disturbing fact that even long-time allies do not have immunity.

The European Union leaders and policy makers are making a riot to recover their view of translatable relations, which looks rapidly unilateral. Trump’s demands-renovation of prices on US goods, forcing countries to increase their NATO contributions, and roaming the rules and regulations on US-tech jinn-are changing the US EU dynamics. Unlike Biden’s allies, Trump’s second term threatens to renovate this relationship as a repression.

However, Europe itself is accused. While China quietly strengthened itself for Trump’s possible return, Europe failed to learn from its first term. Despite tolerating his rapid style, the continent made little effort to prepare for his recovery. Now, the European leader is tied up with an important question: How many statements of Trump are presenting, and how much is the process of the process?

French President Emmanuel Macron is also one of the few European leaders recognizing the growing weakness of the continent. He has long been warned about the need for a strong, more self -reliant Europe. Last year, he announced, “Europe can die, and it depends on our choice.” Nevertheless, despite the demands of Macron’s flexibility, Europe is suffering from a deep breakdown and, many people believe that Trump is in a weak position to face 2.0 during his first term.

A translatric tittrapecphus and trade: Trump has long been criticized for viewing European safety policies, especially on US goods as its prices. In Davos last week, he termed European duties on US cars, and declared them unfair, and if the demands of its lower prices were not met, they warned of unfair and punitive acts. When tariff war caused global markets to stress, this aggressive posting could give rise to commercial tension. But the US president is a point. The European Union has implemented 10 % tariffs on imported US cars, while the United States applies 2.5 % lower tariffs on imported cars from the European Union. This discrimination has been an important point in the NATO conflict: During his first presidency, Trump accused NATO members of freeing the US defense budget. Now, he has returned with even more brave demands. Trump has called on NATO members to contribute 5 % of their GDP to defense. From the point of view of Trump’s transaction for defense funding, the alliance is reduced to “pay -to -play” arrangements, which basically changes its collective security spirit. The risk is exactly the same, complying with it, or is likely to have the possibility of NATO’s most compatible questioning. Tech Regulation: Trump’s disapproval of Europe’s rigorous rules on American tech jinn is no secret. In Davos, it expelled Google from Google, which was accused of suppressing US innovation with excessive fines and red tapes. By preparing it as an attack on the US enterprise, Trump has challenged Europe’s independent right to rule his digital markets. Is Europe leaning?

So far, European leaders have gone lightly, avoiding a direct confrontation with Trump. Public, they emphasize the importance of translantic bonds with warm words, even when its demands are more irrational. But there is a clear anxiety behind diplomatic smiles. European leaders and experts fear that permanently familiarity will eliminate the basic principles of their sovereignty, the rule of law and the collective power gained from unity.

European presses, which often voice over translatric matters, have also been extraordinarily domineering, which reflects the wider hesitation in provoking Trump.

However, silence, as history teaches us, comes with the price. Europe faces a moment of calculation. Should it play a second fadal for us fast -compatible? Or should it push back, endanger the relationship but emphasize its sovereignty and values? The ancient Greek historian and the scope of war, wholesaledides, may have described it as: “Strictly they can do what they can, and the weak have to face those that they must.”

Disposal: These are the author’s personal opinion

(Tagstotranslate) Donald Trump (T) Elon Musk (T) Europe (T) Trump (T) Musk (T) Germany (T) China (T) NATO



Source link