New Delhi: Indian book publishers and their international counterparts have filed a copyright case against Open in New Delhi, a representative said on Friday, a series of latest cases in a series of international cases. I am trying to stop the chatboat to access the properties.

Courts around the world are hearing claims from authors, news outlets and musicians who accuse technology firms of using their copyright work to train AI services and who training to delete chatboats. Trying to use materials for.

The new Federation of Indian Publishers, based in Delhi, told Reuters that it had filed a lawsuit in the Delhi High Court, which is already hearing a similar case against the Open.

The case was filed by all members of the Federation, including publishers such as Bloomsbury, Penguin Random House, Cambridge University Press and Pan McMelan, as well as the publication of Rupa and S Chand and CO to the CO. –

“We have to ask the court to stop accessing our copyright content (Openi),” said Pranav Gupta, general secretary of the federation.

“If they do not want to be licensed with us, they should delete datases used in AI training and tell us how we will be compensated. It affects creativity.

Open did not respond to a request to comment on the allegations and litigation, which was filed in December but is being reported for the first time. It has repeatedly denied such allegations, saying that its AI systems use publicly available public data.

After the start of the Chat GPT’s November 2022, Openi launched an investment, user and corporate frenzy in Generative AI. It wants to stay ahead in the AI ​​race after collecting $ 6.6 billion last year.

The Indian book is trying to join the legalization of the Indian news agency ANI against the Open -backed Open, which is the most high legal action in the nation.

“These matters represent an important moment and can potentially create a future legal framework on AI in India. Siddharth Chandrasekhar, a Mumbai -based lawyer, said that the decision approved here and protection of IP. The balance between promoting advancement will be examined.

In response to the ANI case, Openi said in comments reported by Reuters this week that any order to delete training data would result in a violation of US legal responsibilities, and Indian Judges have no right to hear the copyright case as its server against the company. Located abroad.

The federation said that the opener serves in India so its activities come under Indian laws.

Reuters, who is interested in the ANI, said in a statement that it was not included in its business practices or actions.

Openai hired his first India last year when he tapped former WhatsApp executive, Pragia Misra to handle public policy and partnership in the country of 1.4 billion people, where millions of new users are going online There are, thanks to cheap mobile data prices.

Concern over the book summary

A Reuters reporter on Friday asked Chat GPT for the details of the first skin of the Harry Potter series, through JK Rolling, for the details published by Bloomsbury. The AI ​​Toll summarized an important event, including the abstract of the chapter and the rise of the story.

However, he reduced the original text, however, saying, “I can’t provide the whole book text, because it is a copyright substance.”

The Penguin Random House said in November that it launched a global move to include a statement on the copyright page of its titles, saying, “Any part of this book for the purpose of training. Even cannot be used or reproduced “AI technologies.

The Indian Federation’s Filling, which was seen by Reuters, argues that it received “credible evidence/information” from its members that Openi used his literary works for his chat GPT service training What

“This free tool book summary, squeeze, then why would people buy books?” Gupta said, referring to AI chat boats using unlicensed online copies. “This will affect our sales, all members are worried about it.”

The federation’s petition is still registered only before the Registrar of the Court in New Delhi, who asked the Open on January 10 to respond to the matter. A judge will now hear the case on January 28.





Source link