Chinese Startup Depressic Similar responses have been shown to be impressive abilities Chat GPT During the recent testing. But the alleged DiPsic’s China -hosted version was reluctant to focus on politically sensitive topics. When its performance was usually equal to another AI model for questioning, it became more cautious by responding to the issues that could collide with the Chinese government’s rules.

DiPsic’s response to several questions was recently tested by ACC, which highlighted these differences. Outlet asked the same questions from the Dipic App, Chat GPT and the disturbing Pro version of Deep Sak. Although the answers to all three models were largely the same, China’s hosted version appeared Political sensitivityOffering less reaction.

Compare performance with Chat GPT

In ordinary questions, the Dipic’s model performed well in many areas with equal answers to Chat GPT. For example, when asked about the origin of Covade -19, the two models provided a balanced response, citing both the wet market and the lab -abode.

But the difference in the reaction was seen when Ausus asked about the 1989 Tianman Square protests. Although Chattgapat and Plexyti’s Dippec provided detailed accounts of crackdown on Tianman Square protesters, the Deep Sak app refused to comment on his commitment to “helpless and harmless reactions”.

Also read: When listening to hard, human ear muscles move: study

Questions that yielded similar results

Despite its political boundaries, DiPsic showed flexibility when handling normal questions. Lack of dinner ideas, the depressic app suggested options such as inquired chicken bowls, a DIY taco/Nacho Knight and Sheet Pan Fajitas.

Dipseic anxiety version, while offering more comprehensive specifications, wrap chicken pizza, stir with various bases, and offer options such as a custom chicken bowl.

On the contrary, Chat GPT offered more wider cooking ideas, such as chicken nogs with multiple crust coatings.

To solve a creative problem

In an examination to solve the creative problem, ACCS asked models for ideas about the plans for a sustainable city for the year 2100. Dipoic presented a concept of insights, acenova, which includes renewable energy solutions, hyperlamp transportation and vertical gardens. The distress depressic provided almost the same details, while the response to the chatigo was slightly different in his point of view but is still associated with the future theme.

Also read: Lunar New Year 2025: What is the meaning of the snake year and how it is celebrated in Asia and the whole world

The ACVis report states that although the DPSC model as a whole worked well against AI systems such as Chat GPT, the China -hosted version showed limits in terms of political neutrality. –

Normal questionnaire

1. What makes the DPSK different from Chat GPT?
Dipsechat gives similar reactions to GPT but allegedly at a low training cost.

WhatsApp banner2. Is the Deep See suitable for US users?
According to ASCos, although DipoC provides strong results for ordinary questions, US users can prefer alternatives like Chat GPT because of its irrelevant approach and extensive reaction limit.



Source link