grey placeholderBBCBC Technology Editor Zoo Kleinman holds the AI ​​-Meded Book that a friend of his brought him as a giftBBC

A friend found Zoo as a Christmas presentation

For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a friend – my own “best -selling” book.

“Tech Spelling for Dumma” (Great title) is my name and my picture on its cover, and it has shining reviews.

Yet it was completely written by Ai, with some simple indications about me provided by my friend Janet.

It is an interesting reader, and is very funny in the parts. But it is also much better, and somewhere in the middle of the book and the stream of stories.

It imitates my writing style, but it is a bit repeated, and very functional. It may have gone beyond Janet’s gestures in data collecting about me.

Many phrases begin as “a well -known technology journalist …” – crane – which could be eliminated online.

There is also a mysterious, repeated fraud in the form of my cat (I don’t have pets). And almost every page is a metaphor on each page – a bit more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online that offer AI-Book written services. My book was Book Bion.

When I contacted Israel -based chief executive, Adir Mashiach, he told me that he was left in June 2024 after setting the AI ​​influx travel guides, mainly in the United States, about 150,000 personalities. Sold books.

A paperback copy of your own 240 pages is £ 26. Based on the open source large language model, the firm uses its AI tools to prepare them.

I’m not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can’t – just Janet, who created it, can order more copies.

Currently there is no barrier to creating someone’s name in the name of someone, including celebrities – although Mr Mashiach says there are guards around the content of abuse. Each book contains a printed withdrawal that states that it is imaginary, created by AI, and is designed to “completely humor and happiness”.

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach emphasized that the product is aimed at “personal gift gift”, and books are not sold.

He hopes to expand his limit, which produces different gender -like science -fi, and may offer autobiographical biography. It is designed for the light shape of the consumer AI- which sells AI-breed equipment to human consumers.

This is also a little scary if, like me, you write for a living. At least not because it may take less than a minute to be born, and it certainly looks like me, in some parts.

grey placeholderGetty Images Canadian singer Drake and The Week & Getty Images

Singer Drake and The Veckand’s sound were used without their permission in the song created by AI

Musicians, writers, artists and actors around the world have expressed danger about their work that is being used to train Generative AI tools that then produce similar materials. –

“We should be clear, when we’re talking about the data here, we real means the work of human creators’ life,” Ed Newton Rex, which is the founder of a quite trained, says, Who campaigned for AI firms to respect the rights of creators.

“These are books, these are articles, it is a photo. This is the work of art. This is a record … AI training has to learn to do something and then work more like this.”

In 2023, Canadian singers went viral before pulling a song containing AI generated voices of Drake and the streaming platform on The Week and Social Media because it was not their job and did not agree. He did not stop the creator of the track trying to nominate for the Grammy Award. And although the artists were fake, it was still very popular.

Mr Newton Rex added, “I don’t think the use of Generative AI should be banned for creative purposes, but I think the Generative AI for those purposes who are trained at the work of people without permission. It should be banned. ” “AI can be very powerful but let’s make it moral and fair.”

Some organizations in the UK – including the BBC – have chosen AI developers to stop trolling their online content for training purposes. Others have decided to cooperate – for example, the Financial Times has contributed to Chat GPT creator Openai.

The UK government is considering the restoration of a law that will allow AI developers to help creators’ content on the Internet to develop their models, unless the rights are over.

Ed Newton Rex describes it as “madness”.

He said that AI can develop the work of authors, journalists and artists in areas such as defense, health care and logistics.

He argued that “all these things work without changing copyright law and destroying the country’s livelihoods.”

A cross -bench at the House of Lords is also strictly against the removal of copyright law for Age, overseas Kadran, AI.

There is also a Advisor to the Institute for Ethics at AI at Oxford University, who is also a Advisor to the Institute for Ethics at AI at Oxford University, says “Creative industries are wealthy creators, 2.4 million jobs and a joy of happiness Fully happy. “

“The government is harming industries that have done a great performance on the ambiguous promise of development.”

An official spokesperson said: “No action will be taken until we are fully confident that we have a practical plan that provides each of our purpose: their content for right holders Increase control, access to high quality content in the UK, and more transparent for the right holders of the leading AI.

Under the UK government’s new AI plan, a national data library, which contains widespread public data from sources, will also be made available to AI researchers.

grey placeholderA photo of tech-spleening for dummies, AI-written books in the style of Zoo Kleinman

After President Trump’s return to the United States, the future of federal rules to control the AI ​​is now in the air.

Baiden in 2023 Signed an executive order The purpose is to increase the safety of AI, among other things, the firms involved in this sector need to share the details of their system’s work with the US government before the US government is released.

But now it has been Canceled by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but it is said that he wants the AI ​​sector to face less rule.

It comes like this Multiple legal fodder Continue against AI firms, and especially against the open, in the United States. They have been extracted by the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that when AI firms took their contents from the Internet without their consent, AI firms broke the law, and used it to train their system.

AI companies argue that their actions come under “fair use” and therefore exempt. There are many factors that can create fair use-this is not a straightforward definition. But in the AI ​​sector, there is an inspection of how it is trained and whether it should be paid.

If this was not enough to consider, the Chinese AI firm, DiPesic, shook the sector last week. It became the most downloaded free app on Apple’s US App Store.

Dupic claims that it developed its technology for a part of the open price of openness. Its success has raised security concerns in the United States, and the current US dominance over the sector is in danger.

As far as my and a writer is concerned, I think that at the moment, if I really want a “best cellar”, I still have to write it myself. If anything, tech -spilling for dumma highlights the current weakness in the Generative AI tools for major projects. It is full of mistakes and deceptions, and it can be difficult to read in the parts because it is so long.

But seeing how quickly tech is getting ready, I am not sure how long I can trust that my quite slow human writing and editing skills are better.

Read more global business stories



Source link