Open AI faces a legal challenge in India when a group of prominent book publishers filed a copyright petition in the Delhi High Court. The petition filed on Friday has been accused of using copyright materials without receiving advance consent on Openai’s Chatgpt. Publishers argue that the use of their content by Chat GPT is a threat to the future of the publishing industry in India.

This case highlights the growing concerns over the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in training models such as CHTGPT. Publishers and authors across India have alarmed AI services that they are accessing their copyright tasks without permission. They demand that tech companies, including Openai, stop using such materials to train AI models and review the implications for the rights of property.

The petition, which represents the members of the Federation of Indian Publishers, includes big names of the industry such as Bloomsbury Publishers, Penguin Random House, Cambridge University Press, Pan Mac Millen, Rupa Publications, and S. Chand and Company. These publishers, with newspaper owners. And the authors have demanded a stay order against Openai’s use of their actions.

Publishers are trying to prevent Openai from using their proprietary content without any contract. In a case when Openai refuses to make such a contract, applicants demand that the data set used in Chatgpt training be deleted. In addition, they are seeking compensation for the unauthorized use of their tasks.

This petition comes at a time when Generative AI tools like Chatgpt are gaining attention in the tech industry. Since its inception in November 2022, Chatgpt has made headlines because of its abilities to develop a text like a human being. Last year, the Open AI allegedly earned $ 6.6 billion, which strengthened its position as a leader in the competitive AI market.

However, concerns about the moral and legal impact of the use of copyright content without permission have increased. Publishers fear that widespread adoption of AI can disrupt the traditional publishing model, as technology can damage the value of the original material.



Source link