Openi faces a sharp climb because it argues that Indian courts cannot hear the case about their US -based business in the country, where Telegram has failed to defend similarly and comply with US technology firms. But there is official heat.

Open, which declares India as its second largest market with millions of users, is locked up in a severe court fighting by the domestic news agency ANI for alleged use of copyright content.

The case has gained fame in recent weeks as book publishers and media groups, including billionaire Gautam Adani and Mukesh Ambani, tied together to oppose the open.

The Open AI, which is facing new challenges for the Chinese Startup Dippot, has maintained that it develops its AI model using public information according to the principles of proper use. The company faces similar violations in the United States, Germany and Canada.

Details of the legal denials are not known in the other markets, but in New Delhi it is opposed to the ANI that it has been filed in court that its use terms only call to resolve disputes in San Francisco only. It has been beyond the jurisdiction of the Indian courts and this happens. Do not maintain any server or data center in the country.

“This is a pre -era argument that will not be flown in Indian courts today,” said Dharmendra Chattar, partner of Poya & Company, who advised foreign tech companies.

Chathar added, “Google, X, Facebook all served through their foreign companies and are a party for litigation across India,” Chather added that the courts generally estimated this. Is it accessible to a website and serves users in India in the decision of this point?

Open did not answer Reuters’ questions for this article. In India, his lawyer, Amit Sabal, refused to comment on the ongoing proceedings.

Indian judges could hear the matter in the open litigation, six other lawyers, and the requests of two court specialists appointed by the court, said Ario George Scaria and Adarish Ramanojan said that Indian judges could hear the matter.

“It is clear that Openi is making his interactive services available to consumers in India,” Scaria wrote in the court on January 25, which has not been made public but was seen by Reuters.

The Open website shows that it has received 18 % of Indian taxes on salaries offers, and has recently said that this important market has a “widespread optic of Chat GPT”.

In the Open IN case, a direct victory over the argument of the jurisdiction will mean that the open will not need to face a copyright case in India. If it loses this argument, it will have to counter ANI demand to delete training data and pay 30 230,000 (about Rs 2 crore) in the losses.

The Delhi court is ready to hear the case about jurisdiction and other arguments in February.

When asked about legalism, Reuters, who is interested in the ANI, 26 %, said it was not involved in its business methods or operations.

Foreign defendant

Betting for the power of Indian courts, lawyers and court appointed expert Scaria cited the 2022 decision, which was included as a legal example.

An Indian author had tried telegram for copyright works appearing on telegram groups, but the company refused to share details, saying it was running under the rules in Dubai, where it lives, And there were servers outside India.

Telegram revealed the details when a Delhi judge’s decision: “Regional traditional ideas are no longer exist … (Telegram selection) Not finding its servers in India tackles Indian courts with copyright disputes. Can’t stop. “

The court did not impose a fine.

However, Openi argues that there is a 2009 court view in India, which says simply because an app or web page is accessible, does not mean that judges have a “jurisdiction over foreign defendant. Can be achieved. ”

Even if the openness of the jurisdiction failed to stop the legalism initially, an Indian intellectual property lawyer said it could help the company later appear to be the point of view. The court order will need to be enforced abroad. The lawyer refused to name him because of the sensitivity of the matter.

Although Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government is not a party to the open case, it has been a love relationship with the Big Tech.

In 2021, the Indian Minister of IT cited US -tech firms and said that his “position that I would only rule under US laws” … is not clearly acceptable. “

In the same year, in the very bitter public fee, Twitter, now X refuses to comply with orders to remove some content, and the government issued a press release titled “Twitter needs to comply with land rules. “

The company later complied but tried New Delhi. The case continues.

Before the Indian legal challenges, Open Chief Sam Altman planned a visit to India on February 5. An email also features two other senior executives, James Hairston and Srinivas Narayanan, who intend to live in India as well.

Pragya Misra, an executive of Open India, said last year, “India is really important … We have seen a massive increase of Chat GPT.”

© Thomson Writers 2025

(This story has not been edited by the NDTV staff and has been made auto from the Syndicate Fed.)