Prince Harry Requested to speed it up. Appeal Against the High Court’s decision, it is expected to be heard by the end of July. However, a Court of Appeal judge has now refused to allow him to “jump the queue”, erasing any room for special treatment for the Duke of Sussex.

FILE – Britain’s Prince Harry leaves after attending the Invictus Games Foundation’s 10th anniversary service at St. Paul’s Cathedral in London, Wednesday, May 8, 2024. Prince Harry has been granted permission to appeal against the British government’s rejection of a police protection detail. UK (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth, File) (AP)

Last week, his request to appeal a February ruling that upheld the government’s right to refuse automatic police protection. The royal family member’s request to speed up the process was reportedly linked to his fear that the order would ultimately affect other countries’ actions regarding his security.

Cricket in history, cricket in late! Watch the game anytime, anywhere on Cricket. Find out how

The Sussex couple wrapped up their short “royal” trip to Nigeria in May, and are expected to embark on several trips. Other visits in the near future. According to The Telegraph, Prince Harry was tired of more than two years of litigation. Since Duke’s team will reportedly be busy with other official matters from October, he argued for speeding up the process.

Read this also King Charles ‘refuses to cut ties with Harry’, wants more than video calls for Archie and Lilybet

Prince Harry’s request to speed up the appeal process has been rejected.

Although Lord Justice Bain initially granted leave to appeal, he refused the Duke’s request to speed up the hearing of the official case. In his counter, the judge addressed Prince Harry’s “status” and regardless of whether he would be receiving special treatment to make things easier: “It is not rightly suggested that the claim He is entitled to jump the queue because of this condition.”

Noting that Duke did not lodge. Legal action Denying his right to automatic security in February 2020, 18 months after the decision.

Also read this | ‘Women are Katy’: Bill Maher slams Caitlin Clarke’s team for not defending Skyfevere after controversy

Ultimately, Prince Harry requested a judicial review in September 2021 on five grounds. He reportedly did so because his family had made him a wife due to security concerns. Meghan Markle And children Prince Archie (5) and Princess Lilybet (3) – could not accompany him on UK tours. The Duke also turned down an invitation from his father, King Charles III, to stay at Buckingham Palace for the same reasons, The Telegraph reports.

While most of the grounds of the Prince’s appeal were deemed “untenable”, Lord Justice Bain claimed that the first ground “will have a real prospect of success” as the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec) apparently failed in its writings. had failed to implement the policy. .

Lord Justice Bain also suggested the possibility that Mr Justice Lane, who defeated the Prince in a hard-fought decision in 2020, had wrongly concluded that the Duke was comparable to those in the “other VIP category”. are not eligible for state protection.

Source link